Milestones used to implement the satanic agenda - how do the pieces fit

May 9, 2007

Paris Hilton "I'm too beautiful for jail" vs. OJ Simpson "He is too rich and famous for jail

An example of how the illuminati theater (1) is scripted to serve multiple Illuminati agendas, in this case an illuminati icon (2), Paris Hilton, previously used to sell the pornography and "rich and famous" agenda to the youth. This time the act sells the "Drugs" and "Lies" agendas and is used as "Safety Valve".
It also illustrates (see the two patagraphs added later, at the end) how each act in the script depends on how important each agenda currently is: the script prefers to have Paris Hilton"jailed", i.e. to serve the "Safety Valve" agenda (staging the jailing), instead of having the "Paris Hilton not guilty" act, since the "New Justice" agenda (decisive script was the 1994-1995 OJ Simpson process and "not guilty" veredict) has now been advanced enough.
Illuminati Media Launchs Script
The script is launched in the illuminati media as illuminati icon (Paris Hilton) selling an illuminati organization (MySpace) and the "New Justice" message (too beautiful for jail)
Paris Hilton pleads on her MySpace page to avoid jail for her "mistake"
JAIL-BOUND socialite Paris Hilton has urged fans to sign a petition to pardon her "mistake" because she "provides beauty and excitement to (most of) our otherwise mundane lives". She wrote on her blog: "My friend Joshua started this petition, please help and sihn (sic) it. i LOVE YOU ALL!!!!!",23663,21698892-10388,00.html

Paris Hilton Petition = Multiple Agendas
The first agenda served by the message of Illuminati icon Paris Hilton is "I'm too beautiful for jail", i.e. the "new justice" agenda, for which black and sports icon OJ Simpson was used to set the "He is too rich and famous for jail" milestone.

#1 - Paris Hilton "I'm too beautiful for jail" vs. OJ Simpson "He is too rich and famous for jail"
In this case the title "I'm too beautiful for jail" directly states the agenda behind the "jailing" Paris Hilton act, besides being packaged as illuminati joke.
"I'm too beautiful for jail for just drinking too much" is another repetition of the KEY act used to change what was perceived as justice, at the final leg of road 666: "jailing" OJ Simpson, as part of the "I'm too rich and too famous for jail for just murdering too much".
The circumstancial difference was that in the case of OJ Simpson the illuminati did not stage it from the beginning, i.e. the murders were not planned by the illuminati.

It is not difficult to see which other agenda items are served, right? Hint: pick up MySpace at the top or the "christians" at the botom of the article.

(1) Illuminati theater staged to sell the illuminati agenda - example
Lovelace to Lewinsky, Deep Throat to Blow-Job, Resignation to Acquital, Carter to GW Bush, Vietnam to Armageddon
(2) "Illuminati icon", an expression coined by Matt Marriott, as defined above, icon is used implicitly as "icon for the sheeple".
Illuminati icons: designed to serve the illuminati agenda - examples
Pamela Anderson, Stephen Hawking, Pope John Paul II, Louise Veronica "Madonna" Ciccone: illuminati icons

Added June 4, 2007

Paris Hilton jail script used for a different agenda as OJ Simpson.

In the case of Paris Hilton, the illuminati preferred to use their icon (for the human cattle) for a different purpose.
Since the "sentence", a few days, is easy to be staged (i.e. pretending that Paris Hilton is in prison), the illuminati used Paris Hilton as a safety valve.
Paris Hilton gets punished, but not Bush or Cheney. This is supposed to satisfy non-thinking people's sense of justice.

Paris Hilton was not used for the "new justice" agenda, i.e. "I'm too beautiful for jail" because the illuminati no more need to stage such cases to establish the new justice.
It has already been done.

Added June 29, 2007
Two weeks after Paris Hilton "tears", illuminati media presents the "crowds" cheering Paris Hilton "release" from jail. Finally the illuminati unveil the other main role for Paris Hilton  in the jailing script. This time is not the pornography agenda, it is the drugs and lies agenda.
Larry King, Paris Hilton, drugs agenda and illuminati icons

Forums: --- ( archive )

May 5, 2007

France vs. US elections for dummies: Sarkozy 2007 compared to Bush 2004 and Bush 2000

Sarkozy / Royal 2007 compared to Bush / Kerry 2004 and Bush / Gore 2000

How difficult was it to fulfill the agenda for these three key elections? Comparing how Sarkozy was elected President of France in the french presidential elections 2007 with each of the Bush victories, answers that.

Same as Bush vs. Kerry 2004 - acceptance of voting machines

The introduction of voting machines in the French Presidential elections 2007, served one of two main purposes of its introduction in the US elections 2004:
- have the candidate who was supposed to lose, acknowledge that the elections were fair, i.e.pave the way to have next time votes counted exclusively by machines.

Difference to Bush 2004 - president not decided by the software

But in France 2007, even if in the first round the machines served to count less votes for the anti-EU platform, unlike in the US 2004 elections, the machines were not necessary to elect the candidate who had to win.
That's why its introduction was limited to count only 5 pct of the votes in France. (1)

Same as Bush 2000 - packaged as "nationalist", no need to fraud

The illuminati didn't need voting machines to elect the right candidate because they knew they could use in France 2007 the same trick used with Bush in the 2000 elections: selling the only "alternative" to face the most important problem, the loss of national identity with the "natives" facing the prospect of becoming the minority of the active population in the near future, due to the "open borders" policies.
A couple of sentences was all the packaging the illuminati needed to sell Sarkozy as the man who would solve the problem of the french "banlieue", or in other words, the fact that in 2011 the muslims will be the majority of the population under 30 years age.
An example of a sheep's reaction to this illuminati theater:
Nicolas Sarkozy in quotes
"'I want an integrated Europe, in other words, a Europe that has borders ... Turkey is in Asia Minor."
Turkey will never join the EU....

Like Bush 2004, Sarkozy was the candidate who had to win

Bush was the candidate who had to win in 2004, since Kerry was not the right actor for the role required by the tasks ahead: continuing the war in Iraq, completing the transition to the terror state and continue to reduce the population to "working poor".

If the muslim population in France would be already large enough to prevent Sarkozy from winning, then the software would do the job for him, like it did for Bush in 2004.
In fact for Sarkozy's first task, Segolene Royal would fit more the profile: completing the destruction of what is left from national independence in France (not much...). But since this task is nearly done, it's not decisive for the profile of the right candidate.

His profile fits much better than Royal the second task, the KEY task he has ahead, the reason why Sarkozy was the candidate who had to win 2007 like Bush was 2004: to complete the destruction of the social benefits and of the salaries of the french, by brutally increasing the pace.
A subject for which he was not even forced to play completely theater, like in the "open borders" issue...
(1)France 2007 elections: Voting machines decide French President first time ever

Forums:  ---  (archive)

May 3, 2007

Lovelace to Lewinsky, Deep Throat to Blow-Job, Resignation to Acquital, Carter to GW Bush, Vietnam to Armageddon

Watergate and Lewinsky - similar scripts, differences related to different stages of associated agendas

The illuminati scripts for Nixon's Watergate and Clinton's Lewinsky (1) were very similar:
- distacting from the war;
- implementing the porn agenda;
- selling the Reps. vs. Dems "democracy"; (2)
- preparing the ground for the next president in the illuminati agenda.

Interestingly the "differences" are related to what stages of the related agendas are served:

From Linda Lovelace to Monica Lewinsky, from Deep Throat to Blow-Job, From Nixon to Clinton, From Resignation to Acquital, From Carter to GW Bush, from Vietnam to Armageddon
Below a comparison of the different stages of the main agendas related to Watergate and Lewinsky.

Distracting from the war:
- Watergate: distracting from the END of the Vietnam war, as the illuminati knew the defeat was imminent.
- Lewinsky: distracting from the BEGIN of the Bombing of Serbia, i.e. what the illuminati thought would be the begin of a short campaign to One World Government and in fact turned out to be the begin of World War III.
In 1998 the illuminati web of disinformation played this exactly in the opposite direction, i.e. claiming that the ultimatum to Serbia was to distract from Lewinsky and the "Impeachement".

Implementing the porn agenda:
- Watergate: the begin of the pornography agenda, i.e. using it as a key weapon to brainwash the masses. Some of the details for promoting "Deep Throat", the tool the illuminati selected to full launch the agenda, included staging the "persecution" of porn by "conservative" Nixon and the "deep throat" designation for the Watergate "source".
- Lewinsky: the completion of the pornography agenda, making it daily part of prime news, i.e. as even six years old children could not escape being confronted with it.

Selling the Reps. vs. Dems "democracy":
- Watergate: the completion of the script with the resignation of Nixon was an ideal act to sell it;
- Lewinsky: the defense of the "moral values" by the "conservatives" was again the perfect act to sell it. The acquital was again an ideal act to seal the destruction of those values.

Preparing the ground for the next president:
- Watergate: the "liberal" Carter was the role required following the resignation act; for instance to cover-up the Vietnam defeat or to legalize and openly promote pornography.
- Lewinsky: the "christian fundamentalist" Bush was the role required to upscale the "humanitarian" war of official liar under oath Clinton... to the wars of the president that would have to play the role of never being caught telling the truth, not even once (3). The reason why the illuminati script had Clinton acquited, despite the ultimate lie, i.e. under oath.

(1) The script for Lewinsky and the Clinton "impeachment" was explained in detail by Matt Marriott in the CNN forums 1998. 9 years later nobody seems to have got it yet...
Archived first January 2003.
(2) Staging democracy one of basic acts - more on how it works in "Illuminati exposed"
(3) Wait a moment... There were times when Bush did tell the truth, right?